000			01783cam a2200241 4500500
005			20250121102410.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aBrugidou, Mathieu _eauthor
700	1	0	_a Jobert, Arthur _eauthor
245	0	0	_aA Deliberate Common Sense. Revisiting a Participation in the Drafting Process of an ESEC Note on Consultation
260			_c2017.
500			_a51
520			_aIn this paper we draw some conclusions from our participation, as “experts” in the drafting of a collective opinion piece of the French Economic Social and Environmental Council (ESEC) on the links between stakeholder’s dialogue and economic development. We point out that the outcomes of such a drafting process can be seen as “common sense.” But we elaborate on the idea that this “common sense” can be viewed as the result of a process within the framework of a consensus-orientated institution such as the ESEC. It can also be considered as the result of a social consensus in French society about the usefulness and basic standards of stakeholders’ dialogue. We show that this “consensus” is the result of a negotiation in which managerial rhetoric practices are used to find points of agreement but also to delineate points of contention. This leads us to a conclusion on the political ambivalence of the outcomes of such a process.
690			_alinguistic acceptability
690			_astakeholder engagement
690			_astandards
690			_aThe French Economic
690			_aorganized civil society
690			_aSocial and Environmental Council (ESEC)
786	0		_nParticipations | o 16 | 3 | 2017-05-09 | p. 167-193 | 2034-7650
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-participations-2016-3-page-167?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c526852 _d526852