000			01744cam a2200241 4500500
005			20250121102430.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aSintomer, Yves _eauthor
245	0	0	_aFrom deliberative to radical democracy? Sortition and politics in the twenty-first century
260			_c2019.
500			_a6
520			_aThe paper puts forward four arguments. The first is that over the last few decades, two waves of democratic innovation based upon sortition can be differentiated, based on partly different concrete devices, embodying different social dynamics and pointing toward different kinds of democracy. The second argument is that the rationale of the first wave, based on randomly selected mini-publics, largely differs from the dynamic of political sortition in Athens, as it points toward deliberative democracy rather than radical democracy. Conversely, empowered sortition processes that have emerged during the second wave better capture the spirit of radical Athenian democratic traditions. The third argument is normative: these empowered sortition processes are more promising for a real democratization of democracy. The final argument is that any proposal of a legislature by lot must rely on this lesson when trying to defend a normatively convincing and politically realistic perspective.
690			_aradical democracy
690			_adeliberative pool
690			_adeliberative democracy
690			_acitizen assemblies
690			_arandom selection
690			_acitizen juries
690			_asortition
786	0		_nParticipations | o 23 | 1 | 2019-06-05 | p. 33-59 | 2034-7650
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-participations-2019-1-page-33?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c526906 _d526906