000			01694cam a2200277 4500500
005			20250121102526.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aCharrasse, Fanny _eauthor
245	0	0	_aIs it possible not to be a naturalist? The treatment of supernatural non-humans by some “classical” anthropologists
260			_c2023.
500			_a62
520			_aAnthropology, the daughter and mother of the Great Divide, this radical split between nature and culture that Philippe Descola calls “naturalism”, sometimes tends to put it into question today. Starting from this paradox, this article examines whether it’s really possible not to be a naturalist when you’re an anthropologist, and what it means from an epistemological point of view. In order to find this out, it analyses the way in which supernatural non-humans – spirits, demons, etc. – have been treated by some of the “classics” of the anthropological literature, and observes the naturalistic approach of their authors. In conclusion, it identifies the tools that have contributed (and still contribute) to anthropology’s growing reflexivity about naturalism, and proposes a consistent methodology for investigating magic.
690			_anaturalism
690			_aanthropology
690			_amagic
690			_anon-humans
690			_agreat divide
690			_anaturalism
690			_aanthropology
690			_amagic
690			_anon-humans
690			_agreat divide
786	0		_nPolitiques de communication | - | HS2 | 2023-12-18 | p. 55-83 | 2271-068X
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-politiques-de-communication-2023-HS2-page-55?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c527205 _d527205