000 | 01155cam a2200205 4500500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
005 | 20250121103152.0 | ||
041 | _afre | ||
042 | _adc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 |
_aShifrinson, Joshua _eauthor |
245 | 0 | 0 | _aUnited States: The grand strategy debate |
260 | _c2023. | ||
500 | _a43 | ||
520 | _aThe end of the unipolar era, with the rising strength of China and the failure of America’s engagements abroad, is opening up a debate on grand strategy in the United States. What approach should it take now that the world is once again gripped by competition between powers? The discussion revolves around three major opposing schools of thought: “liberal order idealism”, “illiberal hegemony”, and “restraint”. The debate remains largely unresolved, as the country is only just starting the process of strategic adjustment. | ||
690 | _aChine | ||
690 | _aGrande Stratégie | ||
690 | _aÉtats-Unis | ||
690 | _aCompétition des puissances | ||
786 | 0 | _nPolitique étrangère | Sprig | 1 | 2023-02-24 | p. 39-53 | 0032-342X | |
856 | 4 | 1 | _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-politique-etrangere-2023-1-page-39?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080 |
999 |
_c528706 _d528706 |