000 02580cam a2200301zu 4500
001 88899488
003 FRCYB88899488
005 20250106114359.0
006 m o d
007 cr un
008 250106s2017 fr | o|||||0|0|||eng d
020 _a9781771123075
035 _aFRCYB88899488
040 _aFR-PaCSA
_ben
_c
_erda
100 1 _aBriggs, E. Donald
245 0 1 _aSyria, Press Framing, and the Responsibility to Protect
_c['Briggs, E. Donald', 'Soderlund, Walter C.', 'Najem, Tom Pierre']
264 1 _bWilfrid Laurier University Press
_c2017
300 _a p.
336 _btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _bc
_2rdamdedia
338 _bc
_2rdacarrier
650 0 _a
700 0 _aBriggs, E. Donald
700 0 _aSoderlund, Walter C.
700 0 _aNajem, Tom Pierre
856 4 0 _2Cyberlibris
_uhttps://international.scholarvox.com/netsen/book/88899488
_qtext/html
_a
520 _aThe Syrian Civil War has created the worst humanitarian disaster since the end of World War II, sending shock waves through Syria, its neighbours, and the European Union. Calls for the international community to intervene in the conflict, in compliance with the UN-sanctioned Responsibility to Protect (R2P), occurred from the outset and became even more pronounced following President Assad's use of chemical weapons against civilians in August 2013. Despite that egregious breach of international convention, no humanitarian intervention was forthcoming, leaving critics to argue that UN inertia early in the conflict contributed to the current crisis Syria, Press Framing, and The Responsibility to Protect examines the role of the media in framing the Syrian conflict, their role in promoting or, on the contrary, discouraging a robust international intervention. The media sources examined are all considered influential with respect to the shaping of elite views, either directly on political leaders or indirectly through their influence on public opinion. The volume provides a review of the arguments concerning appropriate international responses to events in Syria and how they were framed in leading newspapers in the United States, Great Britain, and Canada during the crucial early years of the conflict; considers how such media counsel affected the domestic contexts in which American and British decisions were made not to launch forceful interventions following Assad's use of sarin gas in 2013; and offers reasoned speculation on the relevance of R2P in future humanitarian crises in light of the failure to protect Syrian civilians.
999 _c5296
_d5296