000			01935cam a2200229 4500500
005			20250121111136.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aJankowski, Frédérique _eauthor
245	0	0	_aAre Traditional Typologies Functional?
260			_c2013.
500			_a72
520			_aThe agronomic research claims the necessity of taking into account a multiplicity of knowledge forms. Numerous studies encourage the inclusion of local knowledge. In this context, the local taxonomies of soils are used as a scale and a unity of management allowing to include the human aspects of the environmental change, as well as a common language between scientists and farmers. Data collected in a participative research about soil vulnerability in Senegal, permit us to discuss the link existing between typologies, uses and knowledge of the agrarian soils. The study reveals the heterogeneity of local knowledge and a difference between concepts that permit to distinguishing types of soils and those used for their exploitation. While the distinction of soils is based essentially on their biophysical properties, the use strategies call for knowledge relative to the socio-technical, economic and political context. We discuss the way the context of the participative research and its methods influenced the nature of local knowledge that was collected. The heuristic value of local typology of soils appears less as a common language than an object of mutual learning between scientists and farmers.
690			_aparticipative research
690			_alocal knowledge
690			_alocal typology of soils
690			_ascientific knowledge
690			_aethno-soil science
690			_aSenegal
786	0		_nRevue d'anthropologie des connaissances | 7o 1 | 1 | 2013-03-04 | p. 271-290
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-anthropologie-des-connaissances-2013-1-page-271?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c539245 _d539245