000			01864cam a2200217 4500500
005			20250121111139.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aRoger, Antoine _eauthor
245	0	0	_aHarversting the Scientific Field
260			_c2013.
500			_a95
520			_aThe paper aims to shed some light on how agrochemical multinational companies manage to orient academic research and have it contribute to the promotion of intensive agriculture. The case of Romania is examined based on empirical fieldwork. We refute the main explanation of the commitment of researchers to industry, that they are enrolled only because of the provision of new sources of funding by industry. We highlight the structuring effect of divisions within the scientific field. Romanian agronomy is torn by internal divisions that stem from the combination of trajectories followed under the communist regime and the development of new international academic networks. Researchers from the Academy of agricultural and forestry sciences and those from Universities of agricultural sciences and veterinary medicine hold very different positions. As a consequence, fierce wars of classification break out between them. Agrochemical companies fuel the conflict by giving to both parties the means to bolster their arguments. In return, all Romanian researchers are prone to smear small-scale farming and to legitimisethe development of big farms devoted to intensive agriculture.
690			_ainternationalisation
690			_aapplied research
690			_aacademic struggles
690			_aagriculture
690			_amultinational companies
786	0		_nRevue d'anthropologie des connaissances | 7, o 3 | 3 | 2013-09-06 | p. 717-745
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-anthropologie-des-connaissances-2013-3-page-717?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c539268 _d539268