| 000 | 01475cam a2200229 4500500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20250121111220.0 | ||
| 041 | _afre | ||
| 042 | _adc | ||
| 100 | 1 | 0 |
_aDassieu, Lise _eauthor |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aDealing with particular |
| 260 | _c2017. | ||
| 500 | _a39 | ||
| 520 | _aThis paper comes from a field experience in the domain of socio-anthropology of health. It aims to consider the treatment of atypical empirical materials, as categorized by social scientists and/or field actors. These materials can barely be subjects to generalization. However, they are sometimes critical in the process of understanding a social phenomenon. How can we deal with them during the conduct of the research and the data analysis process? This article shows how the “particular” can have a heuristic dimension. It also discusses the solutions to integrate such materials into a general scope analysis. It intends to raise the issue of relations between researchers and their inquiries, and, more widely, between researchers and the knowledge production process in social sciences. | ||
| 690 | _areflexivity | ||
| 690 | _aparticular | ||
| 690 | _asociology of health | ||
| 690 | _ageneralization | ||
| 690 | _aqualitative research | ||
| 690 | _afieldwork | ||
| 786 | 0 | _nRevue d'anthropologie des connaissances | 11o 4 | 4 | 2017-11-30 | p. 549-570 | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-anthropologie-des-connaissances-2017-4-page-549?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080 |
| 999 |
_c539413 _d539413 |
||