000			01400cam a2200157 4500500
005			20250121111552.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aUrfalino, Philippe _eauthor
245	0	0	_aThe Conditions of the Majority Obligation
260			_c2014.
500			_a79
520			_aConsidering one of Georg Simmel’s questions, the article examines what gives an authority to an outnumbering superiority in a situation of a collective decision. Actually there are three conditions in that matter. First, the majority obligation for a collection of individuals’ decisions is possible only if this body is a deliberative body that is to say a collective entity but not a mere collection of individuals. Second, the stake of the decision must not challenge the members’ liking for this collective entity. Finally, to have a legitimate majority, the aggregation of preferences must be reached after a deliberation, thus stressing there might have been other preferences. If the preferences are the same or do not result from the deliberative body’s deliberation, the collective decision looks like a shared decision, a fair one is wished. The rule of the majority is not relevant any longer.
786	0		_nRaisons politiques | o 53 | 1 | 2014-04-02 | p. 139-169 | 1291-1941
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-raisons-politiques-2014-1-page-139?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c540193 _d540193