000 | 01202cam a2200157 4500500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
005 | 20250121112833.0 | ||
041 | _afre | ||
042 | _adc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 |
_aBaubérot-Vincent, Jean _eauthor |
245 | 0 | 0 | _aA Convialist Laïcité |
260 | _c2014. | ||
500 | _a16 | ||
520 | _aThe law of 1905 on the separation of Church and State was passed after more than a century of civil conflict between the “two Frances” (Republican and Catholic-monarchist). While having put an end to the regime of recognized cults subsidized by the state, this law guaranteed freedom of conscience, the free exercise of cults and church self-organisation. Threading a fine balance between opposing forces, the law of 1905 was not to the full satisfaction of any party, and it is in this sense that it is a convivial law. One century later, the law is highly consensual. Yet claims for a “new laïcité” have emerged since 2003, in contradiction with the law of 1905, according to public law professor Pierre-Henri Prélot. | ||
786 | 0 | _nRevue du MAUSS | o 43 | 1 | 2014-05-01 | p. 191-202 | 1247-4819 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-du-mauss-2014-1-page-191?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080 |
999 |
_c543073 _d543073 |