| 000 | 01555cam a2200253 4500500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20250121114047.0 | ||
| 041 | _afre | ||
| 042 | _adc | ||
| 100 | 1 | 0 |
_aGilboa, Itzhak _eauthor |
| 700 | 1 | 0 |
_a Minardi, Stefania _eauthor |
| 700 | 1 | 0 |
_a Samuelson, Larry _eauthor |
| 700 | 1 | 0 |
_a Schmeidler, David _eauthor |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aStates and Contingencies: How to Understand Savage without Anyone Being Hanged |
| 260 | _c2020. | ||
| 500 | _a41 | ||
| 520 | _aModels of decision-making under uncertainty gain much of their power from the specification of states so as to resolve all uncertainty. However, this specification can undermine the presumed observability of preferences on which axiomatic theories of decision-making are based. We introduce the notion of a contingency. Contingencies need not resolve all uncertainty, but preferences over functions from contingencies to outcomes are (at least in principle) observable. In sufficiently simple situations, states and contingencies coincide. In more challenging situations, the analyst must choose between sacrificing observability in order to harness the power of states that resolve all uncertainty, or preserving observability by working with contingencies. JEL Codes: D8. | ||
| 690 | _acontingencies | ||
| 690 | _auncertainty | ||
| 690 | _apreferences | ||
| 690 | _astates | ||
| 690 | _achoice | ||
| 786 | 0 | _nRevue économique | 71 | 2 | 2020-02-18 | p. 365-385 | 0035-2764 | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-economique-2020-2-page-365?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080 |
| 999 |
_c546380 _d546380 |
||