000			02174cam a2200337 4500500
005			20250121115454.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aDanieli, Aude _eauthor
700	1	0	_a Carey-Libbrecht, Liz _eauthor
245	0	0	_a“Stop linky, no thanks”
260			_c2021.
500			_a21
520			_aAlthough more than four out of five households today have a Linky smart meter, the anti-Linky controversy has not weakened in the context of a judicialization of the conflicts in recent years. This article reconstructs the methods of denunciation and mobilization of ordinary consumers, and more precisely of the most resistant fringe among them. In the first part, it proposes a model of engagement in the ‘anti-Linky’ cause, from suspicion to scandal. It shows how customers become involved in politicization in several registers of denunciation (electromagnetic waves and their effects on health, false promises of energy transition, alleged commercial abuses, and risks of surveillance). Their engagement is fostered by the mutualization of arguments, allowing accusations against the meters to protect not only their own homes, seen as intimate spaces, but also those of vulnerable people. The second part describes the stages of ‘home mobilization’ and ‘neighbourhood solidarity’ strategies aimed at pragmatically combatting the installation of the meter and promoting the quest for a non-Linky society, supported by norms of digital sobriety, anti-consumerism and a lifestyle based more on solidarity.
690			_aneighbourhood solidarity
690			_asmart meter
690			_ahome mobilization
690			_adigital sobriety
690			_aprivacy
690			_adisconnection
690			_aprecautionary principle
690			_aneighbourhood solidarity
690			_asmart meter
690			_ahome mobilization
690			_adigital sobriety
690			_aprivacy
690			_adisconnection
690			_aprecautionary principle
786	0		_nRéseaux | o 228 | 4 | 2021-06-22 | p. 233-266 | 0751-7971
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-reseaux-2021-4-page-233?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c549077 _d549077