000			01675cam a2200217 4500500
005			20250121120626.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aO’Neil, Mathieu _eauthor
245	0	0	_aCollaborative Internet Governance: Terms and Conditions of Analysis
260			_c2013.
500			_a49
520			_aOnline projects are communities of practice which attempt to bypass the hierarchies of everyday life and to create autonomous institutions and forms of organisation. A wealth of theoretical frameworks have been put forward to account for these networked actors' capacity to communicate and self-organise. This article reviews terminology used in Internet research and assesses what it implies for the understanding of regulatory-oriented collective action. In terms of the environment in which interpersonal communication occurs, what differences does it make to speak of “public spheres” or of “public spaces”? In terms of social formations, of “organisations” or “networks”? And in terms of the diffusion of information over the global network, of “contagion” or “trajectories”? Selecting theoretical frames is a momentous decision for researchers, as it authorises or forbids the analysis of different types of behaviour and practices.
690			_anetroots
690			_aepistemology
690			_adistributed governance
690			_aonline diffusion
690			_acollective action
786	0		_nRevue française d’études américaines | o 134 | 4 | 2013-10-01 | p. 98-113 | 0397-7870
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-francaise-d-etudes-americaines-2012-4-page-98?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c552220 _d552220