000			01846cam a2200253 4500500
005			20250121120903.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aDeguergue, Maryse _eauthor
245	0	0	_aFocus on administrative responsibility transformations
260			_c2013.
500			_a16
520			_aAdministrative responsibility transformations are assessed in relation to those identified by Husson and Fairé, previous authors on the subject, at the time they were writing. Contemporary developments seem to be characterized by a deepening concept of administrative responsibility and the accompanying notion of redress, compared with the notions of solidarity, indemnification, and compensation. Thus, the autonomy of administrative responsibility, understood in terms of its unconscionability, remains a debated issue. Nevertheless, and despite recognition by the administrative judge of general principles governing the responsibility of public authorities, there is still, paradoxically, no general principle of public authority accountability, as there is for individual liability. This focus on the changes studied is based on an observation, namely the breakdown of traditional legal categories of administrative responsibility, culminating in an attempt at an explanation, looking into the effectiveness of administrative responsibility.
690			_aclassification
690			_alegal redress
690			_aadministration
690			_aResponsibility
690			_airresponsibility
690			_aindividual rights
690			_afoundations
690			_aeffectiveness
786	0		_nRevue française d’administration publique | o 147 | 3 | 2013-11-12 | p. 575-587 | 0152-7401
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-francaise-d-administration-publique-2013-3-page-575?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c552881 _d552881