000			01703cam a2200253 4500500
005			20250121122215.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aKorff-Sausse, Simone _eauthor
245	0	0	_aIn Defense of Interpretation
260			_c2008.
500			_a14
520			_aWith reference to two cases presented at the Deauville Congress that illustrate the role played by infantile sexuality in the course of treatment, the author considers the role of interpretation, which, it has been said, should be limited in the case of borderline states. Does this, in other words, mean that analysts are today abandoning the recourse to interpretation? The question posed here is whether the latter should not perhaps be re-conceptualised in its relation to the specific modalities of transference that appear in contemporary clinical experience and in which infantile sexuality occurs in its most archaic forms, producing complex counter-transferential reactions. Bion’s theory of transformations offers a new model of interpretation that aims not to elucidate repressed unconscious representations but rather to constitute a transformational psychic space thanks to the capacity to fantasise provided by analysis.
690			_aPsychic space
690			_aCapacity to day-dream
690			_aBorderline states
690			_aCounter-transference
690			_aInterpretation
690			_aInfantile sexuality
690			_aTransformation
690			_aTransference
786	0		_nRevue française de psychanalyse | 72 | 3 | 2008-09-09 | p. 777-789 | 0035-2942
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-francaise-de-psychanalyse-2008-3-page-777?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c556152 _d556152