000 01284cam a2200205 4500500
005 20250121122305.0
041 _afre
042 _adc
100 1 0 _aChervet, Emmanuelle
_eauthor
245 0 0 _aIs the Analyst’s Inhibition of Thought a Resistance?
260 _c2009.
500 _a4
520 _aThe dissipation of thought inhibition on the part of the analyst appears to be connected to hysterical identifications that have arisen in contact with the patient. The latter are linked to the analyst's own infantile neurosis that has been ? civilised ? in his own analysis and professional investments and to a subsequent conflictualisation of the latter on an Œdipal mode that in?fine enables him to reinstall a topical framework for and with the patient, the latter constituting a necessary condition for possible formal regression to take place in the treatment.
690 _aWorking-through of the counter-transference
690 _aHysterical identification
690 _aInhibition of the analyst’s thought
690 _aPost-Œdipal topic
786 0 _nRevue française de psychanalyse | 73 | 2 | 2009-05-01 | p. 403-413 | 0035-2942
856 4 1 _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-francaise-de-psychanalyse-2009-2-page-403?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999 _c556441
_d556441