000			01559cam a2200217 4500500
005			20250121123419.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aBleger, Leopoldo _eauthor
245	0	0	_aThe ideal and the transference in the forming of psychoanalysts
260			_c2020.
500			_a6
520			_aThis short text participates in the debate triggered at the IPA (International Psychoanalytical Association) by a change in the number of sessions in the Eitingon model. From a French point of view, this change might seem anecdotic. But it has important repercussions at the clinical as well as at the political and institutional level. Each “forming model” has its own logic. Over and beyond the debate, the author notes the ideal that is always at work: believing that there exists a “right way” to form psychoanalysts. But thinking that there exists an ideal and definitive model of training runs contrary to what analytic training seeks to transmit, i.e. the fundamentally conflictual character of the psyche which manifests itself par excellence through its transference movements. Just like symptoms or dreams, the forming of the psychoanalyst has all the marks of a compromise formation.
690			_atransference
690			_aEitingon model
690			_aforming
690			_aAPF
690			_aideal
786	0		_nRevue française de psychanalyse | 84 | 1 | 2020-02-14 | p. 177-184 | 0035-2942
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-francaise-de-psychanalyse-2020-1-page-177?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c559949 _d559949