000			01610cam a2200229 4500500
005			20250121123423.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aColin, Bertrand _eauthor
245	0	0	_aThe only third is an excluded third
260			_c2020.
500			_a25
520			_aInterpretation gains from upholding the point of view of the excluded third with whom the patient can identify. This hypothesis gives greater depth, on the one hand, to the idea that the only third is an excluded third and, on the other hand, leads to the idea of how much the “child third”, as an “assumption” of the excluded third, and the “paternal third”, owe each other. In other words, the only third is an excluded third, and the third only involves two elements since the two modalities of the third, the paternal third and the child third, are linked to each other. Technically, when interpretation lacks the point of view of the excluded third with whom the patient can identify, it may prove harmful and runs the risk of being persecuting. However, in practice, the third only involves two elements insofar as it brings a third element into play, the feminine third, the “speech-bearer” of the primal scene.
690			_aprimal scene
690			_achild third
690			_afeminine third
690			_apaternal third
690			_aexcluded third
690			_athird
786	0		_nRevue française de psychanalyse | 84 | 2 | 2020-03-19 | p. 333-343 | 0035-2942
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-francaise-de-psychanalyse-2020-2-page-333?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c559967 _d559967