000 02213cam a2200229 4500500
005 20250121123635.0
041 _afre
042 _adc
100 1 0 _aPerrier, Antoine
_eauthor
245 0 0 _aGiving life to institutions and killing them. Congregations under the verdict of the Council of State (1900–1904)
260 _c2019.
500 _a15
520 _aThe congregational dispute was the most violent episode in the secular clash of the Third Republic. It was mainly settled by the law of July 1, 1901, whose application was entrusted to the Conseil d’État (Council of State). The analysis of its general assembly highlights, thanks to the combination of members’ positions and biographical data, the confrontation of two camps. Catholic defenders of congregations used “legal fiction” strategies to maintain the existence of religious societies. The Council of State, although subject to a duty of reservation and an obligation of neutrality, became for a few years a discreet political arena. This politicization was limited by the sense of duty of high-ranking civil servants who managed to reconcile the demands of their service with a hidden opposition. This study highlights some of the features of a Catholic interpretation of the law, which seeks to recognize the spontaneous life of institutions instead of coercing it. It also shows the strategies used by an institution, the Council of State, to persist in a hostile political context. The Council found its balance within the new republican institutions by managing the coexistence of the new republican law with the law of the preceding political regimes. The Council of State was responsible for deciding on the life or death of religious institutions and organized its own survival by taking life sparingly and seeking to harmonize jurisprudence wherever possible.
690 _aThird Republic
690 _aCongregations
690 _aLegal Fiction
690 _aConseil d’État
690 _aFrance
690 _aLaïcité
786 0 _nRevue historique | o 689 | 1 | 2019-02-15 | p. 57-76 | 0035-3264
856 4 1 _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-historique-2019-1-page-57?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999 _c560730
_d560730