000			01429cam a2200217 4500500
005			20250121123714.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aRosé, Daniel _eauthor
245	0	0	_aHopefulness or the mourning of hope
260			_c2022.
500			_a52
520			_aThe author questions the pertinence of using hope and hopefulness indifferently, showing how hope can often be a defence and, conversely, how hopefulness can be a paradoxical experience at the heart of despair. We can thus contrast those who are manifestly driven to despair and those who are inveterately hopeful, whose evolution is sometimes inverted. The work of mourning is revisited, while insisting, more than usual, on its vicissitudes. This leads to questioning anew Freudian metapsychology, particularly its version with deterministic accents: we are then obliged to consider other models arising from non-Newtonian sciences.<br/>Randomness, thus taken into account, redefines the place of a certain freedom in the singular encounter between patient and psychoanalyst.
690			_amasochism
690			_ametapsychology
690			_aomnipotence
690			_arandomness
690			_awork of mourning
786	0		_nRevue française de psychanalyse | 86 | 3 | 2022-05-17 | p. 513-523 | 0035-2942
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-francaise-de-psychanalyse-2022-3-page-513?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c560925 _d560925