000			01476cam a2200217 4500500
005			20250121123738.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aVandamme, Pierre-Étienne _eauthor
245	0	0	_aIs sortition compatible with elections?
260			_c2018.
500			_a69
520			_aMany studies have examined the potential benefits of reintroducing random selection to politics. Most proposals envision sortition as complementary process, rather than as a substitute to elections. This article aims first to highlight the properties and virtues that, at first glance, seem to make these two forms of selection complementary rather than competing mechanisms. In turn, however, it analyses their compatibility by underscoring the rivalry between these two modes of representation. Distinctions between the different uses of sortition shall then be outlined, placing emphasis on those forms which are best able to take advantage of this complementarity, and noting those which, on the contrary, are more likely to cause compatibility issues and even potentially engender a process of mutual delegitimization.
690			_adeliberation
690			_aelection
690			_alegitimacy
690			_arepresentation
690			_asortition
786	0		_nRevue française de science politique | 68 | 5 | 2018-10-05 | p. 873-894
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-francaise-de-science-politique-2018-5-page-873?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c561039 _d561039