000			02694cam a2200301 4500500
005			20250121124759.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aMéthot, Pierre-Olivier _eauthor
245	0	0	_aGeorges Canguilhem and the “problem of evolution” in Le Normal et le pathologique
260			_c2018.
500			_a33
520			_aThis article explores the place of evolutionary theory in Canguilhem’s Essay on some problems concerning the normal and the pathological. After emphasizing the importance of biological thought in his work and after considering his early “evolutionary studies,” this article focuses on “the problem of evolution” in a course Canguilhem taught in the Faculty of Arts at the University of Strasbourg in 1942-43. I argue that he was less concerned with the question of the heredity of acquired traits than with demonstrating the role of mutation in the origin of species. Indeed, if a mutation is not de facto lethal or sub-pathological, a claim made by most “fixist” (creationist) biologists, but capable of giving birth to new forms of life, it is proof that the “anomaly” should not to be considered as pathological from the outset. Canguilhem believes, however, that mutationism alone fails to account for the “adaptive orientation” of living beings in history, which leads to his resorting to the Darwinian principle of natural selection to explain adaptation. But, often portrayed as a conservative process of the “average type” in a population, natural selection also seems inadequate to explain new phenomena in biology. In order to get around this problem, Canguilhem borrows from zoologist Georges Teissier the idea that selection can be “creative” when external conditions change and, building on the latter’s work, argues that a fundamental characteristic of organisms is that they are never indifferent to their environments. In short, Canguilhem has found in evolutionary theory in general the foundation of “vital normativity,” that is, the starting point of his biological philosophy.
690			_amutation
690			_abiological philosophy
690			_athe normal and the pathological
690			_aPhilippe L’Héritier
690			_aLucien Cuénot
690			_aevolutionary theory
690			_aLouis Bounoure
690			_anatural selection
690			_aGeorges Teissier
690			_aadaptation
690			_aMaurice Caullery
690			_avalue
786	0		_nRevue d’histoire des sciences | Volume 71 | 2 | 2018-12-06 | p. 205-241 | 0151-4105
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-d-histoire-des-sciences-2018-2-page-205?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c563859 _d563859