| 000 | 01851cam a2200229 4500500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20250121124940.0 | ||
| 041 | _afre | ||
| 042 | _adc | ||
| 100 | 1 | 0 |
_aGiavarini, Laurence _eauthor |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aHistory, literature, truth. About literature as historiographical action |
| 260 | _c2018. | ||
| 500 | _a42 | ||
| 520 | _aThis article analyses the place of literature in a “system of truth,” relating to specific periods, and much more conflictual than what is assumed by the assertion that there would be some “knowledge of literature.” A detour through writings of the seventeenth century – the moment of the institutionalization of literature – provides a better understanding of its historicity, by asking why, how and for what purposes a writing then presents itself as literature. It thus highlights the importance of historiographical actions that make literature a place for writing history, and of a highly conflictual history, wether the history of the origins of Catholicism (Honoré d’Urfé in L’Astrée) or the history of the Fronde ( Vie du Cardinal de Retz). This approach is reinvested in a completely different « system of truth » – our own system of truth –, through the recent example of the Karski case (2009). I try to question what, in this novel, has affected the historians’ procedures for establishing the truth, including the erection of the witness as a sanctuary of historical truth. | ||
| 690 | _aliterature | ||
| 690 | _aaction | ||
| 690 | _a20th century | ||
| 690 | _a17th century | ||
| 690 | _awitness | ||
| 690 | _ahistoriography | ||
| 786 | 0 | _nRevue d’histoire moderne & contemporaine | o 65-2 | 2 | 2018-07-19 | p. 78-96 | 0048-8003 | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-d-histoire-moderne-et-contemporaine-2018-2-page-78?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080 |
| 999 |
_c564350 _d564350 |
||