000			01359cam a2200157 4500500
005			20250121125751.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aLaniol, Vincent _eauthor
245	0	0	_aConfronting a myth: Facts and perceptions on Article 231 of the Treaty of Versailles
260			_c2014.
500			_a12
520			_aArticle 231, which was the focus of resistances to the Treaty of Versailles, did not originally aim at obtaining a moral admission of guilt from Germany. It originated in the American will to oppose a Franco-British claim to full reparation payments. By doing so, the peacemakers tried to create legal foundations for the reparation payments and exposed a German theoretical civil liability for damages done. It was certainly ambiguous as regards its moral dimension. In reality, it was the German delegation and especially its chief, Brockdorff-Rantzau, who expected such a verdict from the peace terms, who gave a moral significance to the article. “War cultures” and representations inherited from the conflict prevented the Germans as well as the Allies from going back to the original meaning of Article 231.
786	0		_nRelations internationales | o 158 | 2 | 2014-07-25 | p. 9-25 | 0335-2013
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-relations-internationales-2014-2-page-9?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c566264 _d566264