000 01238cam a2200157 4500500
005 20250121130618.0
041 _afre
042 _adc
100 1 0 _aMulgan, Tim
_eauthor
245 0 0 _aMill for a Broken World
260 _c2015.
500 _a22
520 _aThe majority of contemporary political philosophy is based on three assumptions, that (1) interests of present people can be reconciled under “favourable conditions” (Rawls), (2) things will go better for the next generation and (3) favourable conditions will continue indefinitely. But what if they don’t? The paper is exploring the hypothesis of a “broken world” where there is no hope to establish liberal institutions that can both meet basic needs and protect basic liberties. It argues that Mill’s liberal utilitarianism is suited to a broken world because of its flexibility and of its reliance on an objective list of essential components of a flourishing human life that can be shared by present and future generations.
786 0 _nRevue internationale de philosophie | o 272 | 2 | 2015-06-09 | p. 205-224 | 0048-8143
856 4 1 _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-internationale-de-philosophie-2015-2-page-205?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999 _c567690
_d567690