000 01760cam a2200373 4500500
005 20250121130814.0
041 _afre
042 _adc
100 1 0 _aGabaret, Jim
_eauthor
245 0 0 _aIdentity of the singular object: Rosset, Benoist and object realism
260 _c2023.
500 _a70
520 _aClément Rosset’s book L’Objet singulier criticizes the generality of our representations of reality, which lack its singularity by projecting illusory identities onto its objects. The author then runs the risk of defending an unsatisfactory ineffabilism into which many contemporary direct realists still fall. But we can compare these views with Concepts by Jocelyn Benoist and his defense of the adequacy of our representations to the singularity of reality. This allows us to retain Rosset’s healthy skeptical prudence against the temptation of many contemporary “new realists” to blur the differences between the intentional and the real, without making the gap between these two levels an insurmountable fracture for knowledge.
690 _aidentity
690 _aClément Rosset
690 _anominalism
690 _adouble
690 _aJocelyn Benoist
690 _arealism
690 _asingularity
690 _aconcept
690 _aobjects
690 _aidentity
690 _aClément Rosset
690 _anominalism
690 _adouble
690 _aJocelyn Benoist
690 _arealism
690 _asingularity
690 _aconcept
690 _aobjects
786 0 _nRevue internationale de philosophie | o 305 | 3 | 2023-10-10 | p. 67-86 | 0048-8143
856 4 1 _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-internationale-de-philosophie-2023-3-page-67?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999 _c568313
_d568313