000			01974cam a2200253 4500500
005			20250121133831.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aSerra, Daniel _eauthor
245	0	0	_aControversies around Neuroeconomics: Empirical, Methodological and Philosophical Issues
260			_c2023.
500			_a27
520			_aBy the late 1990s, several converging trends in economics, psychology, and neuroscience had set the stage for the birth of a new scientific field known as “neuroeconomics”. As with any emerging discipline – consider for example mathematical economics, econometrics or experimental economics at different times – neuroeconomics is rather controversial with economists. It raises a large number of empirical, methodological and philosophical questions resulting in debates and controversies that this article reviews and discusses by addressing three major issues concerning the contribution made so far to knowledge: Is it reliable? Is it scientifically legitimate? Is it useful for economists? Without claiming to be exhaustive, this analytical framework enables understanding of the thrust of the major criticisms of neuroeconomics. At the same time, the paper sheds light on the nature of the responses likely to be provided in view of the conceptual and empirical progresses made in the field since its emergence and considering the turn identified in the agenda of neuroeconomics over the last decade.
690			_adecision-making
690			_aphilosophy of science
690			_aneuroeconomics
690			_aeconomic methodology
690			_adecision-making
690			_aphilosophy of science
690			_aneuroeconomics
690			_aeconomic methodology
786	0		_nRevue de philosophie économique / Review of Economic Philosophy | 23 | 2 | 2023-06-07 | p. 135-193 | 1376-0971
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-de-philosophie-economique-2022-2-page-135?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c575136 _d575136