000			01891cam a2200373 4500500
005			20250121134322.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aRadrizzani, Ives _eauthor
245	0	0	_aFichte, romantic thinker of the Genius-Nation or Enlightenment’s champion?
260			_c2022.
500			_a19
520			_aThe article examines the consistency of Fichte’s views about cosmopolitism and nationalism, taking special account of a little-known aspect of his political thought, his Masonic commitment, and then examining the texts of the Berlin period, in which the theme of the nation becomes ever more important. More specifically, how is one to interpret the Discourses to the German Nation? Does Fichte operate there a break with the universalist ideals of the Enlightenment? And what status should be given to the idea of a plurality of national particularisms to be preserved? We will endeavor to show that Fichte remains faithful to his republican and universalist views, but we will acknowledge the ambiguity of the recourse, for strategic and rhetorical reasons, to a nationalist vocabulary, which is fundamentally foreign to him.
690			_acosmopolitism
690			_auniversalism
690			_aparticularism
690			_aEnlightenment
690			_apluralism
690			_anationalism
690			_aFichte
690			_arepublicanism
690			_aromantism
690			_acosmopolitism
690			_auniversalism
690			_aparticularism
690			_aEnlightenment
690			_apluralism
690			_anationalism
690			_aFichte
690			_arepublicanism
690			_aromantism
786	0		_nRevue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger | Volume 148 | 1 | 2022-12-06 | p. 37-55 | 0035-3833
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-philosophique-2023-1-page-37?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c576246 _d576246