000			02118cam a2200277 4500500
005			20250121134350.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aGaillard, Georges _eauthor
245	0	0	_aIntervening in Institutions: Preserving Groupality and Restoring the Intermediate Area
260			_c2017.
500			_a18
520			_aThe field of “ mésinscription” (care, social work, etc.,) is massively affected by mutations and the movement of deinstitutionalization that is underway. It is grappling with two main sources of deadly unbinding: that which is manifested by users on the one hand, and that which results from the effects of social mutations and constant restructuring, and the dangers that these pose for institutional organizations on the other. The latter find themselves seriously weakened and the task of forming links becomes all the more demanding, for it requires increasing amounts of energy to deal with the different levels at which links are destabilized, undermined, and destroyed.In this context, the analysis of practice can be thought of as paradigmatic for the practices of regulations insofar as they can help to hold together what tends to break apart within institutional life, and to preserve creativity and investment in a universe where the margins of freedom (professional) are constantly being restricted. These practices have the aim of supporting, or bringing into existence, the group as a sufficiently unifying instance, thereby participating in the reconstruction of collective labour relations and the “common good”.
690			_aregulation
690			_agroupality
690			_atrust
690			_aanalysis of practice
690			_aInstitution
690			_acommon good
690			_aarchaic
690			_aprofessionalism
690			_aintermediate area
690			_abackgrounds
786	0		_nRevue de psychothérapie psychanalytique de groupe | o 68 | 1 | 2017-05-03 | p. 89-100 | 0297-1194
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-de-psychotherapie-psychanalytique-de-groupe-2017-1-page-89?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c576322 _d576322