000 01995cam a2200241 4500500
005 20250121134350.0
041 _afre
042 _adc
100 1 0 _aDubois, Arnaud
_eauthor
700 1 0 _a Lerner-Seï, Sophie
_eauthor
700 1 0 _a Blanchard-Laville, Claudine
_eauthor
245 0 0 _aGroups for Analysing Practices for Teachers. Comparison of Three Settings Inspired by the “Balint group”
260 _c2017.
500 _a20
520 _aThe authors, all three of whom are involved in running groups which conduct clinical analyses of professional practices amongst teachers, compare three settings conceived by Jacques Lévine, Francis Imbert et Claudine Blanchard-Laville for all of whom the influence of the work of Michael Balint was substantial. Starting from this common reference to psychoanalysis, how have these clinicians elaborated their own setting for analysing professional practices? In what respects are they similar or different? After retracing briefly the emergence of the first Balint groups in the field of teaching and training, the authors dwell on each of these three settings in which they analyse successively the purpose of the work, the unfolding of the sessions, the theoretical references mobilised by the group leaders and their relationship to the institution. Drawing on material consisting of articles, testimonies, and extracts from retranscribed sessions, they highlight what constitutes the singularity of these three approaches which they link to the training, career paths, and theoretical references of these initiators.
690 _aGroup
690 _aclinical analysis of professional practices
690 _apsychoanalysis
690 _ateachers
690 _aBalint
786 0 _nRevue de psychothérapie psychanalytique de groupe | o 68 | 1 | 2017-05-03 | p. 115-130 | 0297-1194
856 4 1 _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-de-psychotherapie-psychanalytique-de-groupe-2017-1-page-115?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999 _c576325
_d576325