000			02081cam a2200421 4500500
005			20250121135349.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aCoujou, Jean-Paul _eauthor
245	0	0	_aAlphonse de Madrigal, Thomas More and Suarez
260			_c2021.
500			_a21
520			_aThe philosophy of Suarez, in its implicit comparison with the legacies of Thomas More (1478−1535) and Madrigal (1410? − 1455), enables the identification of a double orientation at the heart of the constitution of political theory: the search for the best polity, for ideal government, for the best republic, which would take precedence in the order of well-being and that would be unsurpassed in nature, as a special space where social imagination would be practiced unfettered; and the endeavor aiming at establishing, not the best form of government but − relying on what people are − the condition of their improvement. It wouldn’t be so much a matter of theorizing about the best system of government than a matter of giving oneself the means of laying down the foundations of the most appropriate form of government, considering human nature. From this alternative, Suarez proposes to ponder over the question of the specific limits of all forms of political practice.
690			_aState
690			_aAnthropology
690			_ahistory
690			_autopia
690			_apassion
690			_aethics
690			_apolitics
690			_astate of nature
690			_aexistence
690			_alaw
690			_atime
690			_aState
690			_aAnthropology
690			_ahistory
690			_autopia
690			_apassion
690			_aethics
690			_apolitics
690			_astate of nature
690			_aexistence
690			_alaw
690			_atime
786	0		_nRevue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques | Volume 104 | 2 | 2021-06-08 | p. 233-260 | 0035-2209
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-des-sciences-philosophiques-et-theologiques-2020-2-page-233?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c578224 _d578224