000 01822cam a2200373 4500500
005 20250121135354.0
041 _afre
042 _adc
100 1 0 _aZovinar Magarditchian, Mariam
_eauthor
245 0 0 _aEpistemology and philosophy of science
260 _c2022.
500 _a71
520 _aThis article outlines the blind spots of a history, that of the qualification of knowledge in the 19th century, from the joint appearance of the neologism epistemology and the phrase philosophy of science. Beyond linguistic and institutional determinations, it endeavors to identify the logic of their common basis, in a century which consolidated both the central role of history and that of the search for a status specific to thought. Thus, it aspires to compensate for the confusions due to the impact of the circulation of ideas (translations, traditions and receptions) and wishes to show the place of a conceptual profusion by endeavoring to account for the unity of habits generated by the heritage of an era.
690 _aphilosophy of science
690 _aW. T. Krug
690 _aW. Wundt
690 _aepistemology
690 _aB. Russell
690 _aJ. F. Ferrier
690 _aH. Vaihinger
690 _aJ. G. Fichte
690 _ahistory of concepts
690 _aphilosophy of science
690 _aW. T. Krug
690 _aW. Wundt
690 _aepistemology
690 _aB. Russell
690 _aJ. F. Ferrier
690 _aH. Vaihinger
690 _aJ. G. Fichte
690 _ahistory of concepts
786 0 _nRevue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques | Volume 106 | 2 | 2022-11-09 | p. 345-372 | 0035-2209
856 4 1 _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-des-sciences-philosophiques-et-theologiques-2022-2-page-345?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999 _c578251
_d578251