000			01828cam a2200277 4500500
005			20250121140059.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aDorobantu, Marius _eauthor
245	0	0	_aInterpreting what is human – Imago Dei in the Digital Age
260			_c2023.
500			_a65
520			_aArtificial intelligence programs are becoming impressively competent at tasks previously regarded as typically human, such as language and art generation or image recognition, inching toward a level of intelligence that matches or even surpasses our own. From a theological perspective, there are concerns that such developments could invalidate the intuition of human distinctiveness, encapsulated in the imago Dei doctrine, rendering us unremarkable and perhaps replaceable. In this article, I argue that such concerns are unwarranted. Technological developments actually represent an opportunity to enrich and re-articulate our theological anthropology by hinting at the true markers of human distinctiveness: not rationality and problem-solving, but authentic personal relationality and vulnerabilty. For imago Dei theology, this means moving away from older substantive models, towards proposals that are eminently relational.
690			_aWolfhart Pannenberg
690			_ahuman distinctiveness
690			_arationality
690			_aartificial general intelligence
690			_aKarl Barth
690			_atheological anthropology
690			_aArtificial intelligence
690			_aartificial superintelligence
690			_aimago Dei
690			_arelationality
786	0		_nRecherches de Science Religieuse | Volume 111 | 4 | 2023-09-27 | p. 661-678 | 0034-1258
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-recherches-de-science-religieuse-2023-4-page-661?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c579990 _d579990