000			01306cam a2200229 4500500
005			20250121140731.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aBlanco, Mercedes _eauthor
245	0	0	_aStylistic Questions about the “Gongora of Psychoanalysis”
260			_c2013.
500			_a71
520			_aThe nickname “Gongora of psychoanalysis” that Lacan gave himself in his writings involves a metaphor and thus a creation of meaning. The Spanish Baroque poet Luis de Góngora (1561–1627) was criticized, in his time and later, for being abstruse and obscure, almost beyond understanding. Lacan received similar criticism. The arguments of each man’s defenders were somewhat similar. For Lacan and Góngora, obscurity stems from a material depth, not from an ideal of profundity. Both take into account, at every step of their discourse, the stratified thickness that every element of language owes to the unique peculiarity of its history.
690			_aGongora
690			_afigures of speech
690			_astyle
690			_aMallarmé
690			_aLacan
690			_aobscurity
786	0		_nSavoirs et clinique | o 16 | 1 | 2013-02-01 | p. 81-93 | 1634-3298
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-savoirs-et-cliniques-2013-1-page-81?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c581157 _d581157