000			01548cam a2200157 4500500
005			20250121140837.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aGilart De Keranflec’h, Charlotte _eauthor
245	0	0	_aOutsider as Insider: Goldstein’s approach to neurorehabilitation
260			_c2024.
500			_a5
520			_aWe have already had the occasion to study how Goldstein offered his fundamental postulates to neurorehabilitation, enabling it to establish itself as a new disciplinary branch of medicine [Gilart de Keranflec’h 2021]. Now we shall hypothesize that the proposals that Goldstein borrowed from his fellow contemporary neurologists by reformulating them, those he rejected and those he prolonged, were successive acculturations leading to a broader area than neurology alone, namely rehabilitative care. Long before he experienced exile —a major biographical turning point in his life—had Goldstein not already led neurology down the path of exile, by demanding that it take into consideration its necessary hybridization with social and environmental issues? Combining dimensions of care, cures and even healing, rehabilitative care challenges the medical discipline alone for its pre-eminence over positive health outcomes for patients with health problems whose severity leaves them in a situation of disability.
786	0		_nPhilosophia Scientiæ | 28-3 | 3 | 2024-10-28 | p. 117-145 | 1281-2463
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-philosophia-scienti-2024-3-page-117?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c581398 _d581398