000			01411cam a2200277 4500500
005			20250121140903.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aPaillard, Joffrey _eauthor
245	0	0	_aUrban design: An “interstitial” disciplinary and security mechanism?
260			_c2023.
500			_a77
520			_aWhile the urban interstice is often considered as a “space of possibilities,” even as a space of “politics” and “resistance,” it could also arguably be transformed into a “micro-space of power”. This article aims to turn this dialectic on its head, to examine and embark on a spatial and urban critique of the city as a normed, normalized, and normalizing living environment. The interstice is understood here as a discrete intervention of urban design on the inhabited territory, potentially allowing for the control, regulation, and discipline of behaviors and conducts within the public space.
690			_aMechanism
690			_aUrban interstitial space
690			_aNorm
690			_aUrban design
690			_aDiscipline
690			_aUrban interstitial space
690			_aNorm
690			_aUrban design
690			_aDevice
690			_aDiscipline
786	0		_nSciences du Design | o 17 | 1 | 2023-07-18 | p. 38-62 | 2428-3711
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-sciences-du-design-2023-1-page-38?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c581463 _d581463