000			01328cam a2200217 4500500
005			20250121140912.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aKaltenbeck, Franz _eauthor
245	0	0	_aDeciphered ecstasy
260			_c2020.
500			_a49
520			_aIn his essay on Proust (1930), Samuel Beckett explains Proust’s idea of the function of art. Art has the quality of “brightness.” Due to this quality, art can decipher the “baffled ecstasy” that the narrator of À la recherche du temps perdu experienced when faced with “the inscrutable surfaces” of certain objects. Unlike Schopenhauer’s aesthetics, the objects that trigger Proust’s ecstasies are not extraordinary. Beckett nevertheless specifies that the “mystery, the essence, the Idea” are “imprisoned in matter.” By rereading Proust and Beckett, we analyze the deciphering of ecstasy by art and its impact on psychoanalysis.
690			_a“hieroglyphics of inspired perception”
690			_ainvoluntary memory
690			_a“obliterated time”
690			_aSchopenhauer
690			_aMalediction of habit and will
786	0		_nSavoirs et clinique | o 26 | 1 | 2020-02-19 | p. 29-39 | 1634-3298
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-savoirs-et-cliniques-2019-1-page-29?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c581520 _d581520