000			01452cam a2200205 4500500
005			20250121141922.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aMartins Portanova Barros, Ana Taís _eauthor
700	1	0	_a Contrera, Malena _eauthor
245	0	0	_aStudies of the imaginary: Initiation as a method
260			_c2019.
500			_a61
520			_aThis essay aims to consider the methodological difficulties for the researcher seeking to study the imaginary. It is postulated that, in the tradition of Gilbert Durand, studies that assume the precedence of the imaginary over other human productions, in relation to heuristic coherence, also embrace the definition of a symbol as a lived sense, that is to say, the result of a condition of an accomplished event. By not constituting a stable empirical property, symbolism cannot be grasped by methodologies centered on rational work on the data. It concludes with the necessary initiatory submission of the researcher to symbolism as a requirement to undertake research on the imaginary, departing from a conception of science that breaks with disjunctive Cartesian thought and proposes a more complex view of phenomena of the imaginary.
690			_aimaginaire
690			_amethod
690			_ainitiation
786	0		_nSociétés | o 142 | 4 | 2019-02-25 | p. 129-140 | 0765-3697
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-societes-2018-4-page-129?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c583494 _d583494