| 000 | 01416cam a2200169 4500500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20250121142948.0 | ||
| 041 | _afre | ||
| 042 | _adc | ||
| 100 | 1 | 0 |
_aJullier, Laurent _eauthor |
| 700 | 1 | 0 |
_a Laborde, Barbara _eauthor |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aThis Is the End |
| 260 | _c2015. | ||
| 500 | _a50 | ||
| 520 | _aCreated in 2003 by Shonda Rhimes, the medical drama TV series Grey’s Anatomy offers its viewers, even if they’re not medics, an alternative way of conducting their daily lives. This model is the ethics of care and concern: if everyone worried more often about others, if everyone understood a little more quickly that everybody needs somebody, the world would be a better place to live in. That is what makes Grey’s Anatomy a somewhat “votive” fiction. Yet the consequentialist dimension of the ethics of care requires this show to frequently deal with the question of endings—one has to know what happens in the end, to evaluate the rightness of a behavior or the retrospective legitimacy of a resolution. This paper investigates three aspects of this question: (1) ending the show (2) eliminating a character for reasons relating to the actor who plays them (3) ending an episode. | ||
| 786 | 0 | _nSociétés & Représentations | o 39 | 1 | 2015-06-18 | p. 103-118 | 1262-2966 | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-societes-et-representations-2015-1-page-103?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080 |
| 999 |
_c585883 _d585883 |
||