000			02134cam a2200229 4500500
005			20250121143010.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aDaniel, Christine _eauthor
700	1	0	_a Bas-Théron, Françoise _eauthor
700	1	0	_a Durand, Nicolas _eauthor
245	0	0	_aHealth Expertise: A Practice-Based Approach
260			_c2012.
500			_a88
520			_aAs a result of various public health crises, expertise in health risk assessment in France has become the responsibility of autonomous state agencies. However, practice shows that despite the institutional separation of expertise and decision-making, the link between health risk assessment and the management of health risks by the public authorities remains ambiguous. Tensions have emerged between the state and the various agencies responsible for providing expertise, especially in cases where agencies make recommendations on procedures and protocols. In addition, while a significant number of regulations have been designed to protect the independence of experts in the health sector, their implementation raises a wide range of practical issues. The number and nature of the common interests of experts and professionals in the health sector complicate the identification and management of potential conflicts of interest. Collaboration between expert bodies only partly compensates for these difficulties. Finally, the involvement of ’stakeholders’ concerned by the results of expertise have sparked a debate that remains unresolved. While some view it as a source of greater knowledge, others have seen the participation of ’lay’ experts as a threat to the quality and impartiality of expertise. Regardless of the preferred approach, recent events show that stakeholders play a key role in health risk monitoring and assessment.
690			_amedical expertise
690			_alobby.
690			_ahealth security
690			_arisk management
786	0		_nSanté Publique | 24 | 1 | 2012-04-01 | p. 41-47 | 0995-3914
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-sante-publique-2012-1-page-41?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c586018 _d586018