000			01612cam a2200217 4500500
005			20250121145926.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aGrillot, Thomas _eauthor
245	0	0	_aHeritage as Family Business and Spiritual Expertise in Sioux Country
260			_c2017.
500			_a42
520			_aWhat can heritage mean for a territory that has never been decolonized? The implementation of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (1990) with regard to the Standing Rock Native American reservation demonstrates how those involved in heritage preservation and repatriation can simultaneously bolster the classic vision of heritage as a set of objects and practices to be preserved, while attacking the colonial nature of the institutions used to protect heritage. Far from being a mere act of transfer between sovereign States, repatriation challenges the very notion of heritage by permitting the performance of rituals whose organizers – spiritual specialists recognised by law – blur the distinction between the dead and the living, as well as been specialists and non-specialists. More than anything, it highlights the central role of family ties in the local socio-political uses of heritage.
690			_arepatriation
690			_aSioux
690			_anative americans
690			_aheritage
690			_aStanding Rock
786	0		_nVingtième Siècle. Revue d’histoire | o 137 | 1 | 2017-12-19 | p. 137-153 | 0294-1759
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-vingtieme-siecle-revue-d-histoire-2018-1-page-137?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c592689 _d592689