| 000 | 01402cam a2200217 4500500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20250121182822.0 | ||
| 041 | _afre | ||
| 042 | _adc | ||
| 100 | 1 | 0 |
_aRassial, Jean-Jacques _eauthor |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aResearch and Findings |
| 260 | _c2005. | ||
| 500 | _a84 | ||
| 520 | _aOne of the main questions in teaching and research on psychoanalysis at university is a heuristic one. Indeed, the theoretical approach is not hypothetical-deductive, validation is not empirical, and discoveries emerge from a conjuncture that involves randomness in transference. Firstly, the author tries to show that nowadays, academic psychoanalysts (far from relying on a fictive extra-territoriality) are aware of the question and propose epistemological responses; secondly, that with the exception of those who support a neo-eclecticism or the subjection of scientific research to the demands of technical performance, academics as a whole are aware of the limits of a totalitarian positivism. Psychology’s current situation is affected by these often implicit tensions. | ||
| 690 | _aheuristic | ||
| 690 | _auniversity | ||
| 690 | _apsychology | ||
| 690 | _apsychoanalysis | ||
| 690 | _atheory | ||
| 786 | 0 | _nCliniques méditerranéennes | o 71 | 1 | 2005-03-01 | p. 169-176 | 0762-7491 | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-cliniques-mediterraneennes-2005-1-page-169?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080 |
| 999 |
_c645329 _d645329 |
||