000			01953cam a2200289 4500500
005			20250121183645.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aSauret, Marie-Jean _eauthor
245	0	0	_aEvaluating a Career
260			_c2010.
500			_a33
520			_aFollowing a brief reminder of the ways in which the author crossed paths with Roland Gori, this article revisits some of the arguments emerging in works about the articulation of the subject and the social bond—taking the opportunity to indicate how they are indebted to the work of Roland Gori and Marie-José Del Volgo. First is psychoanalysis’s conception of the subject of the voice, of the social bond (based on a certain use of discourses to hold the aforementioned subjects together), and of the difference with other social modes. Psychoanalysis sees the role of the indeterminacy of the subject as a condition of the act, as well as the function of the symptom as a subjective solution to link singularity with “living together.” Finally, psychoanalysis considers the extent of the anthropological mutations caused by the changes imposed by transformations in knowledge—in particular, the advent of scientism and its neoliberal collusion with the market. The objective is to contribute to the discussion about the means at our disposal and those to employ for a viable renewal of the social bond (a veritable policy that requires collective logic).
690			_aRoland Gori
690			_asinthome
690			_acivilisation
690			_acollective logic
690			_apsychoanalysis
690			_apolitics
690			_asubject
690			_asocial link
690			_asymptom
690			_acapitalism
690			_aunconscious
786	0		_nCliniques méditerranéennes | o 82 | 2 | 2010-11-29 | p. 135-151 | 0762-7491
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-cliniques-mediterraneennes-2010-2-page-135?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c647740 _d647740