000			01622cam a2200313 4500500
005			20250121183828.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aLippi, Silvia _eauthor
245	0	0	_a“Scientific” Magic in the Renaissance: A Paradox?
260			_c2012.
500			_a95
520			_aOur aim is to analyze the concept of omnipotence of magic thought in the Renaissance, and in particular with Marsilio Ficino, Giovanni Pico della Mirandola, Tommaso Campanella, and Giordano Bruno. The humanist, thanks to magic, tries to take God’s place; he thinks that his science will allow him to change things and his own fate. Humanist magicians, with their imagination and their intuition, contributed to the birth of modern science. Science ended up taking the place not only of magic thought, but of God himself: in the attempt to fight determinism, science became what determines the subject and their story. Thus, we went from the omnipotence of magic thought to the omnipotence of science. What is the position of psychoanalysis toward these two disciplines?
690			_ageocentric
690			_atheism
690			_ahumanism
690			_ahermetic
690			_aanimism
690			_avitalism
690			_aheliocentric
690			_anarcissism
690			_anatural magic
690			_adeterminism
690			_aideal
690			_anature
690			_akabalistic magic
786	0		_nCliniques méditerranéennes | o 85 | 1 | 2012-03-01 | p. 77-89 | 0762-7491
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-cliniques-mediterraneennes-2012-1-page-77?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c648250 _d648250