| 000 | 02818cam a2200265 4500500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20250121193400.0 | ||
| 041 | _afre | ||
| 042 | _adc | ||
| 100 | 1 | 0 |
_aWolton, Dominique _eauthor |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aDéfense et illustration des sciences de la communication |
| 260 | _c2015. | ||
| 500 | _a26 | ||
| 520 | _aLa construction, et la reconnaissance du champ de recherche sur la communication est difficile depuis près d’un siècle pour trois raisons. D’abord, il ne résulte pas d’une évolution au sein des disciplines connues depuis longtemps, mais d’une interaction constante entre les dimensions humaine, sociale et technique. Ensuite, parce que la communication comme objet de connaissance est inséparable de la longue marche politique pour l’émancipation et la liberté individuelle et collective. Enfin, pourquoi s’attarder sur la communication humaine, toujours complexe et souvent décevante, alors que les artefacts sont de plus en plus performants et séduisants ? Ce sont ces trois origines du champ de recherche qui contribuent à rendre ce domaine scientifique complexe, et finalement moins légitime que d’autres sciences « plus pures », pour ne pas dire « plus simples ». Cette complexité est une richesse, mais elle est rarement vue de la sorte. | ||
| 520 | _aProtection and promotion of communication sciencesIt has not been easy, for nearly a century now, to build up and secure recognition for the research field on communication. There are three reasons for this. First, this particular field is not the result of developments within disciplines that have been well known for a long time, but of the constant interaction between three dimensions, the human, the social and the technical. Secondly, because communication as an object of study is inseparable from the long political march towards emancipation and individual and collective freedom. And finally, why spend so much time on human communication, which is always complex and often disappointing, when we have artefacts that are ever more efficient and attractive ? It is this triple origin of our field of scientific research that contributes to its complexity, and ultimately undermines its legitimacy compared to other sciences that are more “pure”, or perhaps more “simple”. Its complexity is its wealth, but is rarely perceived as such. | ||
| 690 | _aaltérité | ||
| 690 | _asciences de la communication | ||
| 690 | _aincommunication | ||
| 690 | _acarré des connaissances | ||
| 690 | _athe knowledge square | ||
| 690 | _acommunication sciences | ||
| 690 | _aotherness | ||
| 690 | _auncommunication | ||
| 786 | 0 | _nHermès, La Revue | 71 | 1 | 2015-04-23 | p. 13-21 | 0767-9513 | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/revue-hermes-la-revue-2015-1-page-13?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080 |
| 999 |
_c663573 _d663573 |
||