000			01561cam a2200217 4500500
005			20250121210559.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aVerdebout, Agatha _eauthor
245	0	0	_aThe Customary Definition of Antononio Cassese’s Terrorism: From Doctrine to the Special Tribunal for Lebanon
260			_c2014.
500			_a53
520			_aAntonio Cassese has always defended the idea that internationalists’ role is to fill the lacunae of international law by putting humanity and its values above the will of states. As a judge, this conviction expressed itself under the form of judicial activism. This article focuses on his treatment of the question of terrorism as a scholar and as President of the STL. In fact, while A. Cassese had been defending the idea for a long time, in February 2011 the STL issued a controversial decision in which it asserted the existence of a customary definition of terrorism. The study tries to understand the underlying objectives of the decision re-contextualizing them into A. Cassese’s general thought. It shows that the aim of the decision was to push the evolution of international law, although its ability to do so remains uncertain.
690			_aAntonio Cassese
690			_aTerrorism
690			_aSpecial Tribunal for Lebanon
690			_aLaw-making
690			_aJudicial activism
786	0		_nDroit et société | o 88 | 3 | 2014-12-09 | p. 709-728 | 0769-3362
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-droit-et-societe1-2014-3-page-709?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c692491 _d692491