| 000 | 01695cam a2200265 4500500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20250121210627.0 | ||
| 041 | _afre | ||
| 042 | _adc | ||
| 100 | 1 | 0 |
_aBarral, Stéphanie _eauthor |
| 700 | 1 | 0 |
_a Guillet, Fanny _eauthor |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aNature’s time, procedural time. Temporality conflicts in environmental law |
| 260 | _c2022. | ||
| 500 | _a80 | ||
| 520 | _aBiodiversity offset regulations, a branch of environmental law, require land developers to restore and protect natural areas to mitigate ecosystem destruction that may occur during the implementation of their projects, generally in perpetuity. Yet, as the means to reach perpetuity are not determined by the legal framework, the environmental law institutes a temporality conflict whose resolution is entrusted to the administration, suffering from a blatant lack of resources, and to an environmental service market, within which land developers find ways to comply with the restauration obligation. This article analyzes the conflict at stake in the administrative and market arenas. It reveals how temporal frameworks are differently appropriated, which leads to a heterogeneous implementation of the law, for which the control of market paces is key. | ||
| 690 | _aStrategic use of time | ||
| 690 | _aBiodiversity offset | ||
| 690 | _aLand and market | ||
| 690 | _aEnvironmental law | ||
| 690 | _aStrategic use of time | ||
| 690 | _aBiodiversity offset | ||
| 690 | _aLand and market | ||
| 690 | _aEnvironmental law | ||
| 786 | 0 | _nDroit et société | o 111 | 2 | 2022-09-28 | p. 305-318 | 0769-3362 | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-droit-et-societe-2022-2-page-305?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080 |
| 999 |
_c692635 _d692635 |
||