| 000 | 01264cam a2200205 4500500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20250121210704.0 | ||
| 041 | _afre | ||
| 042 | _adc | ||
| 100 | 1 | 0 |
_aBrunet, Pierre _eauthor |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aThe Deductive Style of the Conseil d’État and the “Wordshed” |
| 260 | _c2015. | ||
| 500 | _a89 | ||
| 520 | _aJudgments issued by the Conseil d’État retain a very formal style and seem to be reserved for an elite: judgments are less addressed to plaintiffs than to other jurists, many of whom are, in fact national or supranational judges. In order to maximize comprehension by these judges, the Conseil d’État is considering a change in the writing style of public legal decisions. There is no discussion, however, about abandoning the ideal of deduction and concision still modeled as a rigorous syllogism. Such concision is tempered by the conclusions of the rapporteurs, who provide informal reasons for formal decisions. | ||
| 690 | _aJudicial style | ||
| 690 | _aJudicial writing | ||
| 690 | _aJudicial dialogue | ||
| 690 | _aLegal argumentation | ||
| 786 | 0 | _nDroit et société | o 91 | 3 | 2015-11-13 | p. 545-561 | 0769-3362 | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-droit-et-societe1-2015-3-page-545?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080 |
| 999 |
_c692869 _d692869 |
||