000 01639cam a2200265 4500500
005 20250121213241.0
041 _afre
042 _adc
100 1 0 _aRichard, Nicolas
_eauthor
245 0 0 _aUncontrolled Speech? From Opposition Rhetoric to the Language of the Bohemian Revolt (1618-1620)
260 _c2017.
500 _a90
520 _aRarely analyzed by historians who study revolts because it was not spontaneous, popular, or based on any original political thought, the Uprising of Bohemian Estates (1618-1620) provides historians with something rare: banality. The rebelling nobles were indeed accustomed to the heated but codified debates of the kingdom’s diet. The defenestration revived a ritual that was certainly a tradition in the kingdom but not particularly comprehensible for a Europe that was sensitive to questions about sovereignty. On the other hand, ad extra discourse (preserving the position of royal majesty) and ad intra discourse (Protestant prophetism) were carefully controlled—perhaps excessively so, causing rebels to become discouraged.
690 _aseventeenth century
690 _aprophecy
690 _aDolní Ročov (library)
690 _aLouny (Czech Republic)
690 _aDefenestration of Prague (1618)
690 _aBohemia (kingdom)
690 _aOblastní Muzeum v Lounech
690 _aApology of the Bohemian Estates
690 _athe Bohemian Revolt (1618-1620)
786 0 _nDix-septième siècle | o 275 | 2 | 2017-04-28 | p. 211-220 | 0012-4273
856 4 1 _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-dix-septieme-siecle-2017-2-page-211?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999 _c700778
_d700778