000			01688cam a2200289 4500500
005			20250121213811.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aDetlefsen, Karen _eauthor
700	1	0	_a Sabourin, Charlotte _eauthor
245	0	0	_aLiterary genre, method, and the scope of philosophy: The case of Margaret Cavendish’s Prefaces
260			_c2022.
500			_a42
520			_aThe Physical and Philosophical Opinions provides interesting material for understanding Cavendish’s position on the intellectual equality or otherwise of women and men. While the text itself does not provide a definitive account of the subject, the prefatory material to the book, which includes autobiographical musings, helps explain why Cavendish finds the questions so difficult to grapple with. For, because women’s knowledge claims are routinely rejected as carrying value, evidence that women can bring to the question is frequently lost, so it is unclear that the question at hand is yet one that Cavendish and others at her time have sufficient evidence to answer. Turning to the wide range of genres in Cavendish’s oeuvres is crucial for gaining a full understanding of her approach to philosophical questions.
690			_aAutobiography
690			_aMethod
690			_aEquality
690			_aGenre
690			_aEpistemic injustice
690			_aAutobiography
690			_aMethod
690			_aEquality
690			_aGenre
690			_aEpistemic injustice
786	0		_nDix-septième siècle | o 296 | 3 | 2022-05-13 | p. 469-484 | 0012-4273
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-dix-septieme-siecle-2022-3-page-469?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c702760 _d702760